Corrosion Engineering and Twitter

I appear to be as best as I can tell one of the few persons in the Corrosion Control Industry using Twitter.  Two reasons why I have come to this conclusion is:

• that I find only a few corrosion control companies, organizations, or individuals listed on Twitter.'
• both SSPC and NACE International have only a few individuals following their Tweets.

I believe this may change eventually.

I have not found Plaxo to be all that useful in networking with other persons in the corrosion control industry but LinkedIn does have a small group of corrosion control professionals.  

As far as blogs on corrosion control there appears to be only a few.  Some of the corrosion control blogs are not active.  The tendency for the corrosion control blogs is to market services like DCVG surveys.

Facebook appeared to be corrosion control industry free until the Alexander reference cell invasion.  Facebook is now the number one sales website for new and experimental cathodic protection monitoring equipment. 

I have toyed with the idea that this blog would be informational and attempt to avoid controversial topics in the corrosion control industry.  However, the huge Alexander reference cell marketing  program has me pondering if I should be commenting on that matter in this blog.  Not since the late "WaveForm Analyzer " marketing program which turned out to be a failure in improving pipeline integrity have I seen such a marketing program to sell something new and improved for cathodic protection monitoring.   

The WaveForm Analyzer existed in a pre-smart pig (metal loss inline inspection tool) pipeline integrity program environment.  There is now a limited market for new and improved cathodic protection equipment in the USA oil and natural gas pipeline industry in a post-smart pig world.  I tried to explain this fact to a Canadian that came across the border to the USA to market DCVG surveys, but it took a lack of interest by pipeline operators using smart pigs to make him realize market reality for DCVG surveys.

There is a limited market for DCVG surveys in a post-smart pig world on pipelines that fall under gas transmission rules per 192 that cannot be smart pigged.  This is a fact and that is the market for DCVG surveys.

I tend to get shot at for being the messenger of what is reality in the corrosion control industry.  There is nothing wrong with DCVG surveys but smart pigs not DCVG surveys are the pipeline inspection tool of choice by new 192 and 195 federal guidelines.  Reality is that the Office of Pipeline Safety in Washington D.C. now days has a major impact on what tools a pipeline operator can or cannot use in doing an acceptable pipeline integrity program per 192 and 195 federal code minimum requirements.

My Twitter user name for my Corrosion Control Tweets is @CorrosionENG.  It is short for "Corrosion Control Engineer".